http://nkimepx7nuhyzeiy5flekrhwzvuoseowpmxdlu6hw5swqx22qdyhdgqd.onion/the-nap.html
We saw above how the law of non-contradiction is a
self-evident proposition, in disputing anything at all you first must
accept that the law of non-contradiction holds. Similarly, in disputing the NAP you pre-suppose its truth as it is
implied by the very nature of argumentation. First, recall that
argumentation does not exist in a normative void, that is to say there
are certain norms which are pre-supposed in the very act of arguing.